Canadian book with clinical cases of bioethics. This book provides a solid introduction to moral principles and ethical reasoning, but we consider it to be low-yield and rather difficult to read. It requires some basic clinical understanding to best understand the resource. We recommend starting with the University of Washington Bioethics site.

"Great book on ethical behaviour and compassionate medicine" - Ben

Doing Right by Philip C. Hébert is a Canadian book that delves into bioethics through the use of clinical cases. In its fourth edition, this resource offers a case-based approach, which makes it an accessible and practical guide for healthcare trainees and practitioners alike, to navigate the complex world of contemporary biomedical ethics.

The book can help premed students prepare as future physicians by providing them with a solid introduction to moral principles and ethical reasoning. Although it may be considered low-yield and somewhat difficult to read, especially for those without basic clinical understanding, it offers invaluable insights into the ethical challenges healthcare professionals face in real-life scenarios. By studying these cases, premed students can develop their ability to analyze and address ethical dilemmas in a clinical context.

Through the exploration of real-life scenarios, Doing Right allows premed students to better understand and appreciate the ethical dimensions of medical practice. This understanding can help them develop the empathy, professionalism, and ethical decision-making skills necessary to navigate the complexities of patient care.

In summary, Doing Right by Philip C. Hébert is a valuable resource for premed students preparing for their future roles as physicians. While it may require some foundational clinical knowledge, the book offers an applied case-based approach that enables students to engage with ethical issues in a relatable and practical manner, fostering the development of crucial skills for their future medical practice.

Social media has revolutionized the way we connect and share ideas, but should doctors be encouraged to participate? Ollie Burton, a third-year medical student, discusses the pros and cons of doctors engaging with social media.

Having doctors on social media presents a unique opportunity for authoritative voices to share health and wellness information with a wider audience. They can effectively communicate complex ideas and reach patients who might not engage with traditional health literature.

On the other hand, there's a risk of doctors spreading misinformation or focusing on building their online presence rather than enhancing their practice. Conflicts of interest, such as endorsing products, can also arise.

As future medical professionals, embracing social media can be advantageous, but it's essential to maintain professionalism and prioritize patient care. The same standards expected in a clinical environment apply online.

So, consider the impact of your social media presence on your medical journey. Use it responsibly to inspire, educate, and connect with others, while always upholding the integrity of your profession. Be the change you want to see in healthcare and foster a positive online environment for everyone.

Embarking on a medical career, premed students often face complex ethical topics, such as assisted dying and euthanasia. It's crucial to understand and appreciate both sides of the argument to become a well-rounded, compassionate healthcare professional.

Ollie Burton, a second-year medical student at the University of Warwick, offers valuable insights into these challenging subjects. Euthanasia, the act of ending a person's life to prevent suffering, has two categories: voluntary and non-voluntary. It's also essential to distinguish between active and passive euthanasia, as well as assisted suicide.

Though euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are illegal in the UK, the debates surrounding them raise essential questions about autonomy, dignity, and the role of medical professionals. Arguments in favor emphasize personal choice, dignity, and resource allocation, while counterarguments highlight potential power imbalances, the slippery slope effect, and cultural and religious concerns.

As premed students, engaging with these debates will prepare you for the complexities of a medical career. It is your ethical responsibility to consider opposing viewpoints and understand the diverse perspectives held by patients and colleagues. This understanding will ultimately contribute to more compassionate, patient-centered care.