Big list of public MMI questions
Practice for your interview with a big list of sample questions - all for free. Start practicing now.
Videoath Verified.
We routinely check on our resources to ensure they're up to date and continue to be a good reference.
Trusted by 6751 others.
You're in good company. We update this counter to let you know who else completed the prompt.
Review Peer Responses
Preview de-identified and anonymized peers interview responses, providing a rich source of inspiration and insights to refine your own answers.
General Breakdown
Offers an in-depth analysis of interview prompts, providing critical insights such as difficulty level, competencies assessed, and strategic tips. Coming soon!
Expert Response
Watch and learn from experts. Coming soon.
Response Walkthrough
Step-by-step review of good, better, and excellent responses so you know exactly what parts of your responses get you a higher score. Coming soon.
Aggregate Response Score
Compare your response to 100s of peer responses. Coming soon.
Score Breakdown
See how prompts are broken down and reviewed across 1000s of applicants. Coming soon.
Imagine you are the principal of a full fee paying school. There has been an allegation by members of the public of an incident in a park in which at least two senior students were seen verbally abusing a young person with intellectual impairment for the amusement of the group and other students. Two final year students are attending a hearing with you (their principal) to explain their actions in the incident. What are the issues that you (the principal) are likely to consider?
A Kootenay town runs a health-collective that provides various alternative and traditional forms of medicine. The physicians there encourage parents of small children not to vaccinate their children. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this opinion.
Mrs. Jones has signed a donor card indicating that she is willing to donate her body to science without notifying her husband and son. She gets into an accident and it is determined that she is brain dead. The family doctor, who is on call that afternoon, reviews the chart and determines that she would be perfect for medical students to practice the removal of organs for transplantation purposes. The doctor then talks to the family to discuss the procedure and to confirm their consent. They both oppose the procedure and refuse to allow their doctor to move forward. The doctor points out that Mrs. Jones could be helping hundreds of people by educating the medical students and that technically consent has already been provided. The husband understands how beneficial the educational experience is but is too emotional to allow them to continue. The son, a medical student, refuses because he knows the bodies are not treated with dignity. If you were the doctor, how would you proceed? Why?